This is the bell curve:
https://www.statisticshowto.datasciencecentral.com/bell-curve/
It’s a statistical concept that says information about everything will create the shape of a bell curve if you can sample all of the population. Here, population is defined as whatever it is that you’re looking at. [Click the link above to read a more precise definition of a bell curve].
Let me give you an example. This is a rough spread of colours. It’s not accurate but bear with me:
Now, if you could ask every single person on earth which was their favourite colour, you’d end up with a smallish number of people at either end of the bell curve choosing black or white. Most people, however, would choose one of the colours in between those two extremes.
These are the people in the middle of that bell curve.
These are the people commonly referred to as the ‘silent majority’. These are the people who ultimately make or break the system of government we call democracy.
Of course, present day democracy isn’t ‘real’ democracy. It’s representational democracy, meaning we elect a tiny elite to do all the voting for a set period of time. We-the-people are lucky if our single vote has any influence on who is elected to vote for us. I
n case it isn’t completely obvious, I loathe representational democracy, and that’s despite living in a country that does it better than most. In Australia’s version, everyone of voting age has to vote, whether they want to or not. In theory at least, our votes can be expressed as a bell curve because the whole population is included in the result – i.e. some rabid right wingers on one side, some rabid left wingers on the other, and everybody else somewhere in the middle.
The net effect of having all those middies voting is that the power of the two extremes is diluted.
In countries that don’t have compulsory voting, the silent majority largely don’t vote. That means the two extremes are the ones who care enough to vote. And that means the power of the extremes is not moderated by ordinary, everyday voters with ordinary, everyday wants and needs.
I have understood the power of the bell curve for over 40 years. It is the reason I believe that representational democracy will, one day, be superseded by a more direct, more democratic voting system. In this barely imaginable future, ordinary people will be allowed to influence the direction of politics in a more meaningful way. Instead of only getting a say once every 4 years, they’ll have the option of voting directly on issues that concern them. Think social media or #auspol but with teeth. No more electing ambitious, professional bastards politicians to do our voting for us!
That’s the upside of direct voting, but there’s a downside as well, two in fact. People who don’t think direct voting is a good idea usually point to ‘populism’ as an example of how real majority rule can go horribly wrong. And they do have a point. While only the extremes get to have their say, direct rule of any sort can only lead to disaster.
But…we’re now smart enough to factor the ‘extremes’ into any direct voting system we devise. For example, let’s say we have a direct voting referendum on something emotional, like say a new flag. We could set up a system whereby a referendum would only pass [and hence become law] if a majority of at least 95% of the total population actually voted, one way or the other. This would ensure that direct voting faithfully reflected the wants and needs of the real majority.
Ah, but what about security, you say.
At the moment, security is the single biggest issue holding us back from direct voting, but I believe that blockchain technology, or something like it, will eventually make direct voting a viable and secure possibility.
I am still playing through all the issues in my head, but I honestly believe that one day, we will be like those ancient Athenians who first came up with the concept of democracy. It does feel weird though to think that it’s already been well over 2,000 years since democracy was first attempted.
Wouldn’t it be nice if we were the first to finally get it right?
Meeks
April 1st, 2019 at 2:33 am
excellent article about the silent majority. If there were only a way to get the “good people” elected, say Jesus Christ for example. Unfortunately he had serious detractors. Who would decide who the good people are, anyway? Probably the worst of them. 😉
LikeLike
April 1st, 2019 at 10:32 am
You’re right about that, Pat. Sadly even ‘pure’ democracy is an imperfect tool. The problem is humanity and our amazing capacity to be destructive. 😦
LikeLike
April 2nd, 2019 at 1:21 am
Natural leaders always arise in any species through respect or fear, admiration or ambition; goodness or evil optional.
LikeLike
April 2nd, 2019 at 9:30 am
Yeah, I guess we’re all looking for someone to validate us. Such a pity that certain leaders only validate the things we should be ashamed of.
LikeLike
April 4th, 2019 at 12:59 am
Those are the issues that make the headlines, unfortunately. Spring is here though, that’s good news! Is your email working?
LikeLike
April 4th, 2019 at 1:50 pm
Yes, the email is fine. I sent you one ages ago but didn’t get a reply?
LikeLike
April 5th, 2019 at 6:19 am
I meant my email, I haven’t been to the google addy, I’ll try there. I don’t want to lose touch. I don’t do twitter much although I do have an account there, and facebook…yuk.
LikeLike
April 5th, 2019 at 4:41 pm
I replied to the yahoo email. Maybe it went to spam. I’ve had that happen, even when people are on my contact list. Yahoo probably just chucked a wobbly. 🙂
LikeLike
March 28th, 2019 at 7:19 am
I believe engagement is a problem, many people have no faith and/or no interest in who they’re voting for; they feel too far down the food chain so to speak. There are some exceptions and those successful and effective political representatives do exactly what they are elected and paid to do, represent. They live and work among their communities and have similar values. When we have confidence in our elected officials we trust them to vote on the issues on our behalf. This is where a workable sytem is breaking down. Currently we have too many professional politicians who appear foremost to be serving their own aspirations and party lines and who are out of touch with their electorates to whom they pay lip service when it suits them.
LikeLike
March 28th, 2019 at 3:14 pm
Totally agree, EllaD, esp. the bit about ‘professional politicians’. I suspect half the reason so many Independents have been voted in is because they /are/ from their electorates and don’t owe allegiance to anyone else. I wish there were some way of banning parties completely. Not practical from a funding point of view, I know that, but I’m at the stage where pure anarchy is looking good.
LikeLike
March 28th, 2019 at 1:56 am
In the U.S. there are way to many ways to impede voters. It is as if the status quo is holding on to old tech while retaining old fears of a changing electorate. Maybe if Australia does this first, we can follow you?
LikeLike
March 28th, 2019 at 3:19 pm
I know! I’ve read some horror stories about people who wanted to vote and couldn’t. Here, the Electoral Commission bends over backwards to make it as easy as possible. I mean…why always hold elections on a Tuesday when people on low incomes /have/ to work???
LikeLike
March 27th, 2019 at 9:54 pm
Fascinating, intelligent post. I tend to agree with you. One vote. One person. Make it truly our vote, not a ‘representational’ one. No lobbyists! No money allowed to any politician – no money used to sway votes.
Perhaps this is why you and I like to write “speculative” fiction… or fantasy. ;-0 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 28th, 2019 at 3:23 pm
Hey, welcome. 😀 Let’s hope that this particular dream doesn’t stay a fantasy for another two thousand years!
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 27th, 2019 at 7:44 pm
What I do like about the Australian system – and your proposal – is the compulsory element (we’ve said this before). What I don’t like, is that there are many issues where I believe the majority will just get it it very wrong. And before you think that is arrogance, let me give a single example. I’m not going to refer to the Brexit referendum, although God knows that is causing enough agony and has the potential to get a whole lot worse, but figures that suggest that if the UK had a referendum on bringing back the death penalty for various crimes, it would get voted in.
Sometimes you just have to trust those we put into power to make the decisions, and accept that they often understand the issues – especially the more complex ones – better than most of the population who, apart from any other consideration, generally have neither the time nor the will to get their heads around them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 28th, 2019 at 3:50 pm
-shudder- The thought of any sane society re-instating the death penalty makes me sick, literally. That said, though, I have absolutely no faith in our elected politicians to do the right thing either. They are a product of their times as much as we are, so if a series of gruesome crimes made the populous /want/ to re-instate the death penalty, I don’t think the politicians would be immune. That’s as individuals. But what about as politicians?
Here in Australia, our unloved PM likes Muslims as an individual, but to curry favour with his right wing, Muslim hating constituents, he’s prepared to pander to the hate to get votes.
Maybe UK polies have more integrity, but I doubt it.
I used to think that only good people got to rule a country. I was wrong. 😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 28th, 2019 at 6:21 pm
It’s certainly not a perfect system, but I think it still has just enough checks and balances to keep things on a reasonably even keel (this is the UK system I’m talking about), and just enough integrity in Parliament – although you could be forgiven for doubting that at times. Using my example, when it has been tested there has always been a clear majority in Parliament against bringing back the death penalty, despite public opinion, and it is examples like this I cling to, really.
LikeLike
March 28th, 2019 at 9:47 pm
I hope you’re right, Mick, because it’s the only system we’ve got at the moment. Sometimes I fear that we’ll break even this system so badly that democracy will die for another 2000 years. 😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 28th, 2019 at 10:10 pm
Much the same over here. I think it is increasingly fragile, at present. and a lot depends on how this Godawful Brexit mess pans out.
LikeLike
March 29th, 2019 at 9:34 am
Yeah. I heard on TV that your PM offered to resign if that would get her plan through in time. I know she’s roundly hated by both sides at the moment, but as an outsider I think she may be remembered differently in years to come.
Fingers crossed that the change, whatever it may be, will be gentle.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 29th, 2019 at 7:34 pm
Just digging that bunker…
LikeLike
March 29th, 2019 at 7:35 pm
I’ve got a spare pick, if you need it. 😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 27th, 2019 at 4:47 pm
Food for thought…..Your 95% voting rule is a good one……I think there are other barriers in the way. The population not only have to be engaged, but informed. Would we want to vote on everything that we currently hand to the politicians? If we do, then we would need to be very well informed about issues that bore us, and be able to maintain the level of interest over a long period. If we don’t want to vote on everything, we need to have a body, presumably elected, who will decide the boring bits!
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 27th, 2019 at 4:53 pm
Ka-ching! Spot on, Anne. When I first started thinking about this whole thing, I had us voting on everything. Then I realised how impractical that would be. Sadly I think we will have to have elected politicians, but for things that affect the whole country in a major way – including whether we go to war or not – I think the public would have to be given the chance to vote as well – like a stool with 3 legs.
The 95% rule would still apply but it would be up to the passionate ones at either end of out bell curve to convince those in the middle that their way is best.
Clunky, but I think it would work.
LikeLike
March 27th, 2019 at 11:57 am
I share the dream, the reality may come after I’m gone …
LikeLike
March 27th, 2019 at 1:30 pm
I think I might be gone too, but after so long it’s hard not to be impatient. Esp. with the mess we have at the moment.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 27th, 2019 at 3:35 pm
Worst of all is that they (pollies) think we (the general middle of the bell curve) don’t understand exactly what they’re up to …
LikeLike
March 27th, 2019 at 4:46 pm
Yeah. 😦 I have no idea what kind of focus group they’re listening to, but it definitely ain’t ‘us’. I think that’s part of the reason social media has become as politicized as it has, because we’re not being heard any other way.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 27th, 2019 at 7:12 pm
and how sad is that – we pay them to ignore us and then have to use open media …
no wonder I’m apolotical (no, that’s not a mistake (a form of “a pollyanna tick, y’all”).
LikeLike
March 28th, 2019 at 3:51 pm
-giggles- I think I must be apolotical too. 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person